Message #3

Immersed in Mixed Messages on Obesity

At the National Academies yesterday, we found ourselves immersed in mixed messages on obesity. The occasion was a public workshop on effective communications strategies for obesity. OCEANS President Faith Newsome summed it up for us:

I left with a lot of questions, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. We talk about “solutions” and promote “healthy” weights. It seems confusing. I think we finally understand that obesity is a disease. But we don’t treat it like it’s chronic. I left wondering what solutions we have, who they work for, and when obesity is “fixed” or “cured.”

The Cacophony of Messages

To put it simply, messages are burying us. Harvard’s Vish Viswanath told us that we are pumping out 2.5 quintillion bytes of information every day. Thousands of messages compete daily for our limited attention span.

No wonder people are cynical. Edelman’s Adelaide Feuer explained that people have come to trust friends and peers more than experts. Way more than government officials.

Bias Deeply Embedded

The Rudd Center’s Rebecca Puhl reminded us that “stigmatising messages have been ingrained in our social fabric for many years.” As if to prove that point, Suzi Gates of CDC warned us that “we are at risk of normalizing unhealthy weight.” She cited Rihanna’s size-inclusive fashion show as something that steps over the line.

Fat shaming is definitely not cool. But implicit bias pops up at every turn.

We Need to Agree on Goals

As Newsome told us, the messaging landscape for obesity and health is very confused. Are we talking size and weight? Can we even say the O-word? Gary Foster, the Chief Scientific Officer for WW, brought some consumer insights to answer these questions.

Language about overweight and obesity alienates many people in a broad audience. Moralizing weight and eating behaviors is a problem. Diet is a four letter word. Cheating may as well be. Healthy eating and active living are behaviors we can promote.

Bias and stigma might also be a common issue on which many different stakeholders can agree. Obesity is a disease that leaves many people quite uncomfortable. Even physicians find it hard to discuss – even with a patient one to one. Mass communications? Forget it.

Almost 40 percent of American adults are living with obesity. So telling people that they should conform to a norm for body size just doesn’t work. Great people come in all sizes. And a healthy size for one will never be a healthy size for all.

Click here and here for further perspective about public health messaging on obesity. For a patient perspective from OAC Vice Chair Patty Nece on cutting through the mixed messages on obesity, click here.

Message #3, photograph © Jon Nicholls / flickr

Subscribe by email to follow the accumulating evidence and observations that shape our view of health, obesity, and policy.


 

September 17, 2019

2 Responses to “Immersed in Mixed Messages on Obesity”

  1. September 17, 2019 at 10:30 am, David Brown said:

    Faith Newsome said, “I left with a lot of questions, which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. We talk about ‘solutions’ and promote ‘healthy’ weights. It seems confusing. I think we finally understand that obesity is a disease. But we don’t treat it like it’s chronic. I left wondering what solutions we have, who they work for, and when obesity is ‘fixed’ or ‘cured.'”

    The big problem is that obesity and the so-called chronic diseases are symptoms. Treating symptoms is not as efficient as preventing the cause. What has been causing these symptoms? In 1992 German researcher Olaf Adam wrote, “Within the last 50 years, changing nutritional habits in Western communities led to a fourfold increase in the supply of dietary arachidonic acid (AA), provoked by the same increase in the consumption of meat and meat products. A low oxidation rate and a high affinity uptake system result in the accumulation of AA in cell lipids. Clinical experiments with AA supplements showed the efficient enrichment of AA in plasma lipids and a consecutively exaggerated production of eicosanoids.” https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00180737

    In 1992 Adam published the results of research in which arachidonic acid reduction (in meat) was part of experimental protocol. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12548439

    This year, his former nutrition student Johan Woelber published a gingivitis research article in which reduced arachidonic acid intake was part of experimental protocol. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jcpe.13094

    In the 2-1/2 years that I have been perusing arachidonic acid research, these are the only two instances in which arachidonic acid reduction was deliberately used as a therapeutic tool. Incidentally, patients in the arachidonic acid reduction arm of the Woelber experiment lost weight. Excerpt: “While there were no differences regarding the plaque values, the experimental group showed a significant reduction in gingival bleeding, a significant increase in Vitamin D values, and a significant weight loss.”

  2. September 18, 2019 at 10:49 am, Emily Robinson said:

    « Great people come in all sizes » A phrase I wish more people understood