Black Pearl and Shell

The Persistent Irritant of Implicit Ignorance About Obesity

Environmental Obesity DriversWarning: this is a bit of a rant, albeit a good-natured one. The persistent irritant of implicit ignorance about obesity confronts us in virtually every dialogue we have about obesity. Sometimes it gets to be too much.

Specifically, it is the presumption woven into almost every conversation about obesity, that obesity is all about bad diets. For instance, Alex Henney and colleagues recently wrote in Obesity Reviews:

“Given that poor diet quality is known to increase mortality from chronic disease, it is imperative and timely to review trends in UPF consumption in the United Kingdom and how they are associated with poorer health on a biological, epidemiological, and sociological level, to inform future clinical and political decisions aiming to improve the public health of the United Kingdom.”

Focusing on One-Fourth of the Story

On the surface, there’s nothing wrong with what Henney et al are writing. Poor diet quality is a problem that merits attention. The pursuit of strategies to improve nutrition across the population of the UK or the entire world is, of course, worthwhile.

But dietary patterns do not exist in a vacuum and obesity does not arise strictly because of poor dietary choices. Our physical environment, chemical exposures, and stressful lives all play a role. Focusing on diet alone is short-sighted.

Physical Environment

We have rising obesity because of physical environments, technology, and lives that lead to less routine physical exertion. We sit in front of screens for work, learning, and enrichment. Cars and other vehicles take the place of walking. We even have moving sidewalks and escalators to spare us from the effort of moving our feet. Machines do manual tasks that our bodies once did.

Brief trips to the gym do not cancel out the metabolic effects of the inactive lives we have engineered for ourselves.

Stress and Stressors

Moreover, stress and stressors have profound effects on our metabolic status. Economic, social, and traumatic stress are triggers for eating patterns that don’t go away because we know we should be eating our veggies. Too little sleep can be a trigger for weight gain. Time poverty means that many people do not have the luxury of cooking with whole foods from scratch. In that context, inexpensive ultra-processed foods meet a real human need.

Drug and Chemical Exposures

And then, finally, we are constantly exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals and drugs that prompt weight gain. Nearly a quarter of adults are taking medicines that will cause them to gain weight – regardless of what they choose to eat. Pollution bathes us in BPA, PFAS, microplastics, and other chemical entities that prompt our bodies to store more fat.

So, yes, the presumption that obesity is merely the result of bad diets is irritating. Because people with good intentions presume that we can overcome obesity simply by “fixing” our diets. Decades of such narrow efforts have proven this presumption to be false.

Click here for perspective on the complex nature of obesity’s causes. For more on systems science to overcome biased mental models of obesity, click here.

Black Pearl and Shell, photograph by Brocken Inaglory, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0

Subscribe by email to follow the accumulating evidence and observations that shape our view of health, obesity, and policy.


 

August 4, 2024

5 Responses to “The Persistent Irritant of Implicit Ignorance About Obesity”

  1. August 04, 2024 at 6:54 am, Joe Gitchell said:

    Ted – what would you offer up as the best and most dispassionate argument FOR diet as the most important/only important contributor to population weight gain?

    Who would be the one if you were to follow Tamar Haspel’s advice of how to communicate better #4 “Find the smartest person who disagrees with you and listen”?

    Thank you.

    Joe

    • August 04, 2024 at 3:35 pm, Ted said:

      Not sure, Joe, because in explicit terms, most everyone concedes that both diet and exercise are important. But most often they focus solely on diet. So I listen closely to smart dietitians and nutrition scholars.

  2. August 04, 2024 at 8:36 pm, Allen Browne said:

    Yup! Very thoughtful comments. “Food for thought”

    Allen

  3. August 05, 2024 at 4:21 am, Mary-Jo said:

    “presumption that obesity is merely the result of bad diets is irritating” — yes, it is.

    I have worked with so many people who cook from scratch, eat wholesome food but who, genetically predisposed to obesity, find themselves unable to feel satiated and eat more than their bodies are ‘hard-wired’ to burn for energy needs, thus, storing and depositing more adipose tissue. Add the modern physical environments requiring less energy needs for ADLs, as mentioned in this post, energy expenditure even more decreased than in previous decades/ generations. Imo, the packaging of UPFs may be a more significant factor than contents/ingredients/nutritional value for their endocrine disruptor proliferation in our bodies and environment.

  4. August 05, 2024 at 6:01 pm, Jennie Brand-Miller said:

    Long before UPF and supermarkets, Australia had an abundance of food in rural areas.There were 10 times more sheep than people (we grew wool for the “Empire”) and mutton was eaten for breakfast, lunch and dinner. We grew wheat and sugar cane. We ate home-cooked meals, cakes and biscuits with jam, butter and cream. We drank cordials, lemonade and beer. Horse and wagon were the main means of transport. If you look at the old black and white photos of the 1930s, many women had what is clearly obesity. The men tended to be slim. The children had lots of “puppy fat” (a very old term). And when you are poor or bored, food hits the spot (a dopamine hit). Simple food abundance.