Are Standing Desks Destined to Gather Dust?

Standing desks arrived with high hopes of countering the health risks of a sedentary office lifestyle, promising to reduce heart disease and improve circulation. However, recent research in the International Journal of Epidemiology casts doubt on whether simply swapping sitting for standing delivers these benefits.

Cardiovascular Risk Benefit?

In a study of over 83,000 adults, researchers found that prolonged standing – defined as more than two hours per day – does little to reduce cardiovascular risk. Instead, it may increase the likelihood of circulatory problems such as varicose veins, orthostatic hypotension, and other conditions related to blood flow. In contrast, prolonged sitting (over ten hours daily) remains linked to a higher risk of heart disease, confirming the danger of sustained stationary behavior, whether sitting or standing​.

Static Positions

Experts suggest that static positions are the core issue, not sitting versus standing. Movement appears crucial: short, regular breaks to walk or stretch are essential, as is any activity that avoids continuous immobility. Devices like under-desk treadmills may also support this approach, allowing users to remain active even while working.

So, while standing desks aren’t entirely destined to gather dust, they may require rethinking. Health benefits depend on breaking up static time, making them just one part of a broader, movement-focused strategy. As workplaces rethink wellness, it’s clear that standing desks alone fall short as a simple fix—and that true health benefits come with balance and regular activity.

Click here for the new study in the International Journal of Epidemiology, here and here for further perspective.

Writing Desk, painting by Olga Rozanova / WikiArt

Subscribe by email to follow the accumulating evidence and observations that shape our view of health, obesity, and policy.

November 13, 2024